435 is Too Many

435 is Too Many

Today’s House of Representatives is a far cry from the republican ideal of the founders. It does not provide Americans with the kind of representation the founders intended. Each representative in the House is limited by the committee system and by partisanship and seniority and their calendar and a dozen other considerations. There are just too many people in the House.

Read More

435 is Not Enough

435 is Not Enough

The founders’ ideal of 30,000-to-one has faded in the rear-view mirror. The number of constituents each member of the House represents now varies from a little over 500,000 in Rhode Island to more than a million in Montana. Montanans have half the representation that Rhode Islanders have, and that’s not fair. But nobody anywhere in America gets the level of representation the founding fathers intended, and that is not fair, either.

Read More

Constitutional Stupidity

Constitutional Stupidity

Most of the time, American citizens think of the US Constitution as a positive. Even when they are complaining about the way things are, few would heap any of the blame on Constitution itself. It is common for serious commentators to say that all America really needs is to “get back to the Constitution.” Many of the nation’s most prominent and respected law professors and constitutional experts don’t agree. Those scholars and experts see very serious flaws in the Constitution.

Read More

As American as Apple Pie

As American as Apple Pie

In the United States of America, replacing an existing constitution with a newer one happens fairly often, to good effect and with little turmoil. Citizens assembled, discussed what they wanted from government, designed a plan combining proven methods from other states and nations with new ideas they believed worth trying. They then submitted their plan to the voting public of the state. It’s a process that no one who believes in representative government could object to.

Read More

Madison & Jefferson on the Future

Madison & Jefferson on the Future

Madison and Jefferson agree that public debt can be necessary and proper at times. Madison recollects that America incurred debt during the Revolution, which was certainly worth it and certainly would make future generations happy and free. In any similar case, where future generations would be richer and happier because of past spending, Madison expressed himself willing for the living to pass debt onto the next generation.

Read More