Where is the measure or criterion to which we can appeal, for determining what will give the Senate too much, too little, or barely the proper degree of influence?

The presidency didn’t even exist yet, but opponents already described him as a wasteful, lazy, murderous pervert.

The man who holds the office doesn’t recognize Constitutional limitations at all.

Hamilton admits he’s not sure, and has no way of being sure, that four years is the right number of years. He is confident, though, that the president should be allowed to run for re-election without limitation.

"Of the three powers, the judiciary is next to nothing."

Hamilton described the opponents’ case as “subtleties almost too contemptible for refutation,” meaning they were too stupid to argue with.

He aims to exhaust readers’ attention span by focusing on the rights that ARE in the Constitution, so they will lose interest and forget to notice that the Constitution fails to mention freedom of speech, assembly, religion, and several more.

The final essay had no great effect on history. But it serves as a fitting close to the effort.